Friday, January 23, 2026

My Car Battery Died, and So Did My Brand Loyalty


Two days ago, my morning started with a small but very real crisis. My car took longer than usual to start. Weak battery. Not catastrophic, but annoying enough when you have a meeting to get to and zero patience for surprises.

The good news is that we live in a world where a car battery can be replaced within an hour, sometimes faster, thanks to apps, chat, and location sharing. Convenience has officially won. The bad news is that convenience only works when the experience actually delivers.

I had two options. Let’s call them Provider B and Provider C.

Provider C was my usual go to. I had used them for my last three battery replacements. They were responsive, reasonably priced, and generally reliable. Provider B, on the other hand, kept appearing in my search results every time I Googled for alternatives. Not new to the market, clearly investing in visibility, and curious enough for me to give them a shot.

So I did what most consumers do. I messaged both providers at the same time to get a quote and see who came back first with the best option. Time mattered. I needed to be in the office by a specific hour and my battery was not interested in my calendar.

Here’s where things started to get interesting from a marketing and experience point of view.

Provider C had recently discontinued their app. Everything was now routed through web chat on their website. The initial interaction was automated. It collected my details, car make, and battery type before handing me off to a live agent.

Provider B took a very different approach. Their entire journey was managed on WhatsApp. The app itself was mostly for profiling, invoices, payments, and showcasing services. Quotes, location sharing, and conversations were all handled by a real human via chat.

Provider C responded first, thanks to automation. It felt efficient. Clean. Structured. Provider B was slightly slower because a live agent was handling the message. At that point, Provider C was winning.

Then pricing came in.

Provider C shared a quote quickly. Provider B followed not long after, though their initial price was higher. Like any rational consumer, I asked both for alternative options on pricing and availability. Same brand. Same battery type. Apples to apples.

This was the turning point.

Provider C went quiet. Ten minutes passed. Then more. Meanwhile, Provider B came back promptly with multiple options, clear pricing, and availability. No back and forth. No waiting. Just answers.

With time ticking and my meeting looming, the decision was made for me.

When Provider C finally replied, the options were more expensive, and the battery I wanted was not in stock until the next business day. That sealed it. I went with Provider B. Faster response. Better alternatives. Cheaper in the end. Problem solved before my second cup of coffee.

From a marketing perspective, this had nothing to do with brand love or loyalty. It had everything to do with speed, clarity, and momentum.

In high intent moments like this, the funnel collapses. Awareness, consideration, and decision happen in minutes. Automation helps until it slows things down. Loyalty exists until urgency shows up. The brand that removes friction fastest wins the sale.

Lessons learnt from a marketing perspective

  1. Speed is part of your product
    Response time is not a service metric. It is a conversion lever. When urgency is high, speed beats familiarity.

  2. Automation should accelerate, not stall
    Automation is powerful, but only if it hands off smoothly. The moment it creates waiting time, it becomes a liability.

  3. High intent moments compress the funnel
    Customers do not move through neat stages. In urgent scenarios, decision making is instant. Your systems need to keep up.

  4. Clarity beats cleverness
    Clear options, transparent pricing, and fast answers outperform fancy journeys and polished decks.

  5. Meet customers where they already are
    Messaging platforms like WhatsApp reduce friction because users do not need to learn anything new. Familiar tools win under pressure.

  6. Loyalty is fragile when time is limited
    Past experience helps, but it will not save you if you respond too slowly when it matters most.

At the end of the day, great marketing is not just about being visible or memorable. It is about showing up at the exact moment a customer needs you and making the decision ridiculously easy. Bonus points if you do it before their battery, or patience, fully dies.

What about you? Do you share a similar experience where brand loyalty is lost through a bad experience?




Thursday, January 22, 2026

The Sneaker Rebalance: Why My Rack (and the Market) is Shifting

Sneakers in an art gallery

For all who know me personally, know I have a passion for collecting sneakers. I have a modest collection of about 45 pairs, ranging from brands such as Nike, Adidas, New Balance, ASICS, and Puma. Most of the sneakers I have purchased are what I would consider "art pieces" as I tend to gravitate toward designs that are rare or feature unique, or unconventional colorways.

While about 74% of my collection currently consists of Nike and Adidas, I have noticed a telling trend lately. My last few purchases have all been from either New Balance or ASICS. This is no coincidence. So, I decided to dig into the data, and it turns out the sneaker world is mirroring my personal shift. We are witnessing a massive rebalancing of power in the footwear industry.

The Data Behind the Shift

If we look at the numbers from 2020 to 2024, the incumbents like Nike and Adidas are facing a momentum crisis, while the challengers are experiencing a golden age.

  • Nike’s Stalling Engine: Nike remains the undisputed king in volume, but their growth has hit a plateau. In 2024, they hit a wall with near-flat revenue growth. Their stock price faced significant pressure as brand heat cooled.

  • The Rise of the Underdogs: New Balance has seen staggering 20% annual growth for four consecutive years, reaching $7.8 billion in 2024. Meanwhile, ASICS has recorded record profits. Their "SportStyle" lifestyle category surged by over 50% in recent quarterly reports.

Global Sneaker Revenue 2020-2024
Global sneaker market revenue 2020-2024
Global Sneaker Momentum 2020-2024
Global Sneaker Growth Momentum

The graphs above tell two different stories: Scale vs. Momentum.

  1. Scale: Nike and Adidas are still massive, earning 5–10x more than their rivals.

  2. Momentum: New Balance and ASICS are growing 2–5x faster, effectively stealing market share and "cool factor" from the giants.

Global Revenue Growth by Brand
Global Revenue Growth by Brand (USD)


The Innovation Gap: Why Nike is Stagnating

I see three main reasons why the giant is stumbling:

  1. Direct-to-Consumer (DTC) Overreach: Nike cut ties with many local boutiques to force sales through their own apps. This left a physical void on store shelves. New Balance and ASICS were happy to fill that space.

  2. Franchise Fatigue: Nike relied too heavily on the "Big Three", which are the Dunk, Jordan 1, and Air Force 1. By flooding the market with endless colorways, they accidentally killed the scarcity that made these shoes art pieces.

  3. The Performance Exodus: Serious athletes are moving to niche brands. When the pro runner switches to ASICS for better tech, the lifestyle consumer follows the cool factor of that performance authenticity.


The New Balance Playbook: How to Build Heat

New Balance’s rise is a masterclass in strategic brand repositioning. Their momentum is a calculated mix of these 4 factors:

1. Collaborations (The Catalyst: 40%)

New Balance didn't just slap a logo on a shoe; they gave creative control to tastemakers who deeply understood street culture.

  • Joe Freshgoods: He brought storytelling and color that resonated with a younger, diverse audience that previously viewed NB as "boring."

Salehe Bembury x New Balance 2002R "Water Be The Guide"
One of the pairs in my collection, Salehe Bembury x New Balance 2002R "Water Be The Guide"


2. Trend / Aesthetics (The Fuel: 30%)
  • The "Dad Shoe" Wave: The market shifted toward "Normcore" and "Gorpcore" (functional, slightly chunky, comfortable gear). New Balance didn't have to invent a fake trend; they owned this heritage.
  • Right Place, Right Time: When skinny jeans died and baggy pants returned, chunky New Balance silhouettes (like the 9060, 2002R, and 990) naturally looked better with the new fashion silhouette than sleek Nikes.

3. Innovation / Product Quality (The Foundation: 20%)
  • Retention: Hype gets you a customer once; comfort keeps them. The "Fresh Foam" and "FuelCell" technologies are genuinely respected by runners.
  • Made in USA/UK: In an era of cheap manufacturing, their "Made in USA" line (marketed as premium quality at a higher price point) creates a "luxury" halo that justifies the hype.

4. Marketing (The Amplifier: 10%)

  • "We Got Now": Their marketing didn't try to make New Balance look "cool" in a forced way. Instead, they leaned into their identity ("worn by supermodels in London and dads in Ohio").

  • Athlete Selection: Signing Shohei Ohtani, Coco Gauff, and Kawhi Leonard signaled they were still a serious sports brand, not just a fashion house.

New Balance 740
My latest pick up: New Balance 740

Final Thoughts

As a collector, I am drawn to the newness and superior comfort of my ASICS Gel-Kayano and my New Balance 740. As a researcher, I see a market that is no longer satisfied with brand heritage alone. It wants innovation, quality, and a sense of discovery.

The sneaker industry is no longer a two-horse race. It is a diverse ecosystem where the niche brands are becoming the new mainstream. My next purchase probably will not have a Swoosh or Three Stripes on it. Based on the data, yours might not either.

This video summarizes this perfectly



Interested to see my sneaker collection? 
10. Google Gemini Deep Market Research




Older Posts